historical victim blaming as signaling or evidence of flawed character isn't the same as finding a lack of integrity. someone might very well believe what makes them fail to be seen as credible.
many countries often require study and research before approving a medication.
recommending clinical trials isn't the same as approval. scared of bad medical practices?
elective surgery shouldn't appear disfiguring.
www.goodrx.com/acetaminophen/tylenol-and-alcohol
for covid treatment attempts to prevent hypoxia. following the pandemic there are actual antivirals doctors could use after a patient contracts an illness from that virus. hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were studied and weren't found effective as antiviral medications for covid. by contrast, even though tylenol is regularly used to treat inflammation and fever, that fever on its own can become life threatening. if you have a severe concern seek medical care. [they may recommend tylenol.]
so if (only if?) clinton flew to epstein island who went with him? guess that's one way to get leverage over a government agency.
first of all | 21:13.6 - 22:13.6
light to see | 1:21.8 - 2:21.8
sounds good | 0:09.9 - 0:54.9
no light | 0:16.1 - 1:16.1
2:26.9 ->
sabotage, regardless of its distraction from or in furtherance of fraud, still causes its own damage.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=beastie+sabotage
am lately considering schemers more often because so many people seem either scammed or scammy. many times these confidence games appear simplistic. a ponzi scheme or just a box of rocks really seems like scamming on training wheels. however neither automatically includes an exit or exits.