https://duckduckgo.com/?q=protest+50501+schedule
so? is that extra liable for (if a) government supported misrepresentation -> ? does that make it a more severe offense if a government or governments conspired to publicly defraud a person's work without reason, evidence, or anything credible?
wouldn't that also be a mistake? wouldn't a responsible government be required to address evidentiary concerns to provide legal recourse? sounds a bit lost? maybe sounds a bit derelict? wandering aimlessly doesn't sound like a good excuse for people entrusted with being a resource for people by people. maybe it's the weather today. i feel differently about how badly this could impact people just for failing to consider how public dishonesty might incur possibly unrelated damage to others. irrationally tying one confessed crime to another feels directionless. fraud plus fraud doesn't amount to zero fraud.
is the usage of those irresponsible mistakes by ineffective officials treatable as extortive leverage? could any fraud claiming false authority then also be additionally liable? even if dishonesty wasn't intended the usage of leverage raises concern.
would that extend to charges of extortion being brought regardless of the national origin of the leverage or threat of leverage or threat? i do live in one of the countries that is legally capable of prosecuting internationally. would any capable government be interested in even charging those claiming the imaginary authority of extorting the general public here?
not really considered authority absent responsibility and kind of reminds me to check where i am today. wouldn't want to be against even my own interests.
does really have nothing to do with my producing or posting content. may be wasting my time thinking about it again. sounds like a hindrance for any platform online.
funnier to think about how you miss that last part completely today. plan an executive "pay" raise, again? please tell me more about your accomplishments.
america does also share the responsibility for prosecuting war crimes. i don't think anyone charged with them could visit without going to court. does a war criminal know that pardon authority might not exist there by treaty? were they smart enough or are they dumb enough? guess they could also move into the white house.
"- and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, -" then for everywhere else a senseless act of self interest still wouldn't be mercy from an executive.
national embassy part of their new plan? can't reach the war criminal for comment? seriously, this is below dull.
too many exceptions make for no rule. thanks again to cornell law for making the internet a little more capable than news. seen this before doesn't make it livable.
[democrats and republicans thinking they can "work" through this one. it's a beautiful day here and a growing economy. the news-> the democrats, and the republicans don't realize that they don't need the comic relief brought by smaller, private, political parties. responsibilities are the same either way for each office without any affiliation to incur an easier lack of credibility. if you're just going to keep it up, how is that worse.]
all you ever think about? "who's in charge today." makes no difference. always feels pretty great to never have that. you took what? had to leave. been back a while. you really just plain couldn't manage. feel the same myself. won't miss it. rather try to not. just painful to see new, record setting pointlessness. won't miss that either. never was in charge. who won't blame those. without ever living here, you might.
so, anyway. this still (i know) isn't about me. they don't do any of the work. they rob the business owners of publicly and privately held businesses blind while being the most offensive, self important, and useless fools you've ever seen. they are also the most uninteresting and uncreative people the world may ever see. i am so happy with the idea of leaving it to late night and their continuing coverage of corporate and corporate style "executives". <crowd roars> let's not forget the often and regularly incomprehensible politically-minded. <crowd roars>
yawn. without further ado:
https://www.interbridge.com/lineups.html
the reigning champion here of updated internet guides. <crickets chirp>
bye for now
